- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Article was vandalised by IP in same range as creators, is unsourced and appears hoaxy. I reached it by going through the contributions of 213.249.155.240 (talk · contribs) after deleting Barton-in-the-Beans, a nonsense attack, on what appears to be a non-existent village. - Mgm|(talk) 12:29, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- He was a good man, do him justice by having this page kept. Do your research first, before making assumptions.
- Delete, MacGyverMagic beat me to completing the afd on this one, but my original reason for nomination is: Looks like a hoax, the IP who created it has proceeded to vandalize it, quick google search does not draw up anyone by this name who fits the original description. — MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip — 12:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- No, the IP who created it differs in the last 2 numbers. It's likely they are related, but we can't be sure the creator vandalized it themselves. - Mgm|(talk) 12:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, I see you are right. Still, original content appears to be a hoax. — MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip — 12:52, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The users on 213.249.155.231 (talk · contribs), 213.249.155.239 (talk · contribs), 213.249.155.240 (talk · contribs) have been crossing each other's paths today, performing similar looking vandalism and creating articles that may be hoaxes. It looks to me like one or more English school boys, possibly moving around between machines. - Dalbury (talk) 19:44, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No its true, he was like a brother to Luther King, look it up (unsigned edit by 213.249.155.239 (talk · contribs)) - Dalbury (talk) 19:50, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If that statement is true, then cite your sources. Otherwise, delete. ♠DanMS 16:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails the Google test Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 16:12, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. *drew 00:51, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as per nom Pete.Hurd 06:25, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.