Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cam Harker Spring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cam Harker Spring

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page was created in 2006 and has not been substantially altered since; has been tagged for notability since 2012. No reason to believe that this spring is notable. Emeraude (talk) 19:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete can't find any coverage, and give that it is a spring, it is not likely to have attracted much.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - towns, rivers, mountains, and seas are notable, but springs are springs. Even assuming this was created in good faith, there's no significant coverage in reliable sources. The only semi-reliable source is a single-line listing. Bearian (talk) 20:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Springs can be notable like everything else. But like most, this one isn't. It does exist, with a reliable source. But no coverage for GNG. Can't think of any reasonable redirect target. MB 02:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.