Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Robert Epstein . we have to conclude this sometimes, and in lieu of a no-consensus I'm going to be bold and redirect to the founder., until someone can find more sources. DGG ( talk ) 02:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created back in 2009 and immediately tagged as being of questionable notability. The creator of the page is a WP:SPA with a clear personal connection to the subject of this article and the connected topic Robert Epstein. While Epstein himself may be noteworthy, his article reads like a puff piece. This article is better written, but doesn't cite a single source to demonstrate notability. The article has been tagged as such for over three years, and neither the article's creator nor anyone else has attempted to solve this problem in any significant fashion. I figured nominating the page here would at least generate some discussion that might lead to the page's getting improved if somehow it is found to merit not being deleted. elvenscout742 (talk) 05:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-the author can try to add new sources to avoid deletion.--Soroboro (talk) 01:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 10:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.