Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camera filename structure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Camera filename structure

unsourced trivia list, probably not even worth merging, but there's an open merge proposal in case anything thinks there's anything to salvage from it Dicklyon (talk) 20:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't really see how this can be encyclopedic and appears to be less than accurate. --neonwhite user page talk 00:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ There's a merge proposal only a few days old, please don't disrupt it. Squidfryerchef (talk) 01:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, it was my proposal, as a reaction to an unsuppported proposal to merge to a less appropriate place. But I haven't seen any action on it, like support, opposition, or otherwise, and I didn't see anything to merge really, so I thought a delete would be more on point, hence this AfD. Let me know if you see some reason to consider merging what's there, which looks all like trivial OR. Dicklyon (talk) 01:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who suggested the merge, and didn't know about the "design rule" page, but think it is a more appropriate choice. But all this was only a few days ago. There is no deadline. Squidfryerchef (talk) 02:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Utterly trivial; incomplete; unecyclopaedic. Ros0709 (talk) 13:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found a page out there that has a lot of this information. I'll add an external link to "Design rule" and drop my objection to deleting the page. Squidfryerchef (talk) 02:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - detailed trivia -- Whpq (talk) 16:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.