Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Dallas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:11, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Dallas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't think this fits the CSD criteria. Seems to be a social media fad, doesn't meet notability guidelines for BLP Zeus^u|c 02:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I have been anticipated by Zeus :-) patrolling the page. Anyway, I vote deletion per G11 (promotional style), A7 and also because, looking at "what links here", I've found 3 user talks with a tag for speedy deletion: Magconluver8 Camzbae, Erin K.O Blake. So this article was speedy deleted 3 times (8 March 2014, 10 March 2014, 7 May 2014) and the current author is Lseids. Suspecting that the users, only with contribs related to "Cameron Dallas", could be related, I've opened this SPI page. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Borg, thanks for all the detail. I first threw A7 up on it but after a quick Google search I wasn't sure that would fly, so I just took it here. Should be a relatively uncontested removal and then we can CSD it per G4 in the future... Zeus^u|c 02:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :-). I've seen for few seconds the {{Db-a7}}... You've done the better action: me too, when I'm not sure, I prefere to use the AFD. Anyway, I suppose this is a case of sockpuppetry, or meatpuppetry, related to the promotion of the subject. Note: I suggest to block the title "Cameron Dallas" to avoid further creations... at least until (and if) the person purchases notability. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 03:00, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note: Searching for the title Cameron dallas, I've found that the page was deleted in April, and the author was Ilysmcamerondallas. --Dэя-Бøяg 18:20, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promotional and failing WP:GNG. STATic message me! 20:01, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence that he has yet achieved notability per WP:BIO, and the sources don't meet the WP:GNG requirements. —C.Fred (talk) 01:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.