Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Ocasio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Only one person arguing to keep, but he presented sources which nobody explicitly refuted, so I'm assuming they're valid. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:32, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Ocasio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Has an interview in a teen magazine, but nothing else in-depth. Is in the main cast of a television show but has otherwise had bit parts—doesn't meet any part of WP:NACTOR. I'd entertain a redirect to Sam & Cat, if needed. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 10:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. czar 10:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are no signs of better satisfying the creative entertainers notability, and I would've also suggested adding a redirect to Sam & Cat as 35 episodes may be enough. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes criteria 2 of WP:NACTOR of having a large fan base, as he had third billing in all 35 episodes of Sam & Cat, which was shown worldwide.However, WP:NACTOR are only guidelines that indicate whether reliable sources are likely to be found, so will look for RS to pass WP:VerifiabilityAtlantic306 (talk) 03:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For NACTOR#2, I don't see any reliable source evidence of a fan base specific to Ocasio. czar 05:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there is a lot of web activity on him, with a lot of interviews including The Huffington Post. An example of his popularity here [1] picking up an award for the show at an awards ceremony voted for by children. The interview here [2] is followed by some decent prose which could be sourced to the article . I'm still looking for more sources but iI think it should be remembered that there is nothing contentious or even personal in the article.Atlantic306 (talk) 03:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage from reliable independent sources to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:21, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment more examples of coverage of the actor [3] and [4] (talk) 18:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.