- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. In view of the low participation, this is a WP:SOFTDELETE; as with a PROD, the article will be restored on request at WP:REFUND, but may then be renominated. JohnCD (talk) 22:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Camp Setebaid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references and a Google search reveals almost nothing but databases/directories and sites written by the camp itself. King Jakob C2 23:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 16. Snotbot t • c » 23:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Undecided. Google Books hits for "Camp Setebaid" all look like directories or those books that copy from Wikipedia. Google News archives, however, brings up a decent number of results, but it looks like they're all behind paywalls… CtP (t • c) 19:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I looked at the news results, and, if I'm not mistaken, most of them just mention the camp in passing.King Jakob C2 23:36, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Funny Pika! 12:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CORP: kids' summer camps are generally not notable enough for their own articles. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.