Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Can't be Arsed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 21:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Never gonna warrant a real entry --Dangherous 00:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete as it stands. It may be expanded (articles often are after included in AfD) but at this point I don't see how. Ifnord 00:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete as above, might be a wikitionary one Robdurbar 00:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Copy to Wiktionary, then delete this. -- The Anome 00:31, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wiktionary already has this covered, and covered better, in arse. Uncle G 00:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Wiktionary already covering it better. --Quarl 01:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wiktionary can cover this in more depth and proper context. -- (aeropagitica)  01:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Wiktionary. — MATHWIZ2020 ^{TALK | CONTRIBS} 01:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please read the immediately preceding discussion. Uncle G 01:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination and no transwiki per Uncle G. Movementarian 04:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. novacatz 06:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Longhair 06:59, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Cobra 09:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Ambi 10:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Nick123 ^(t/c) 13:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Sarah Ewart 13:06, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Roisterer 14:00, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Dicdefcruft. Transwiki. JFW | T@lk 14:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination and no transwiki per Uncle G. --Tagishsimon (talk)
• Delete per nom. Even although it is common in the UK. --Kilo-Lima 16:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -Fabhcún 18:00, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- Give it the Arse. Reyk 21:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.