- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Candy Elektra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails to establish any level of notability. Fails GNG & PORNBIO. EuroPride (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. EuroPride (talk) 12:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree does not meet PORNBIO or GNG. Morbidthoughts (talk) 14:47, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my original prod, which was removed on the spurious grounds that appearing in 20 porn films satisfied notability requirements. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:52, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article as it stands states she is notable without giving sufficient backed-up evidence that she is notable. For example, "She is also a well known star of girl/girl erotica and various alternative fetish and horror films", which carries no cite at all. Tabercil (talk) 12:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.