Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Manson (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 22:42, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Candy Manson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can meet the GNG or any other specialized guideline. Deleted after initial AFD, survived 2nd AFD based on now-rejected "one-nomination" standard and on subject's claim of upcoming mainstream TV work, which never materialized. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Has not award's nominations in multiple years. No appearance on any television series. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1696323/ --Braghis (talk) 22:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral This is a very borderline case. I am not sure the article has been kept up to date. However, even if there were no wins in 2008 and 2009, I am not so sure that the nomination is so stale as to make deletion necessary yet. On the other hand since college athletes only get one calendar year to show professional experience if they have not won major awards, maybe this is due for deletion because there has only been one nomination and a two year void.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. SilverserenC 09:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, leaning toward Keep vote I have tagged this article for rescue.
- I have also added these three sources to the article. SilverserenC 09:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO and the sources in the article are either unreliable or trivial. She has some reliable coverage here, but its not enough to meet WP:GNG. Epbr123 (talk) 10:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per Epbr123 - Fails WP:PORNBIO and no significant coverage to pass GNG. EuroPride (talk) 16:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.