Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canuleze language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:32, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is most likely what I would call a "private conlang", only used by one or two persons; I couldn't find anything about "Canuleze" or "Cánulze" on Google. The article was written by the inventor of the language itself. Anyway, I think it's a non-notable language. N-true 16:30, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nominator. — N-true 16:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Says itself that it is is a constructed langauge spoeken by a small group. If it is indeed notable, this should be citable. JPD (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Cedars 03:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Sounds unimportant or completly made up. If deleted also delete its userboxes in the Babel section. Felixboy 16:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.