- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seicer | talk | contribs 14:26, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Capatism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Another editor's Prod notice was removed so I'm bringing this to Afd - Appears to be attempt to create a neologism - only appearance of this word found looks like misspelling in a public comment below a news item [1] Hunting dog (talk) 22:00, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unsourced non-notable neologism. --Lockley (talk) 22:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. JavierMC 22:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced even in the sources provided. Steve Dufour (talk) 23:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 01:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — reeks of soapboxing. MuZemike (talk) 03:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Probably should have been speedied but definitely unsourced, non-notable and a neologism per Lockley. MvjsTalking 10:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.