- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Capecodcracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Was retagged, but I removed since you can only prod an article once. However, the reasoning still stands. "WP:NEOLOGISM; "capecodcracy" gets exactly two ghits, one of which is this article, and the other is in WP user space. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day" Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 07:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Capecodcracy 66 hits on google half of them being about an expired ___domain name. -AMAPO (talk) 07:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for above-mentioned reasons (unsurprisingly, since I was the guy who retagged it; sorry, I'd missed it had been previously prodded). Will note that most of those 66 ghits from the Mexican Google are actually capecodecraZy, not capecodcraCy; the US Google doesn't give the crazy term, and thus zero non-Wikipedia hits. --Nat Gertler (talk) 07:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.