 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 December 2. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Capri Anderson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails PORNBIO. Classic case of WP:BLP1E. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:34, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Looks like this was created solely because of the Charley Sheen incident. At this point in time, that's the sole claim for notability and that's not enough for me. Also, on the porn career basis no indication of notability within that profession per the PORNBIO guidelines. And to underscore the nominator's rationale: "Why, yes, this IS a classic case of WP:BLP1E." --Quartermaster (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Some minutes ago I have reverted some fake interwikis. But in fact she is notable, see this article or have a look on this really big German newspaper. Every day they currently present a little story about Capri Anderson (with and without Charley Sheen). 78.55.55.121 (talk) 20:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The first source is a wiki of unknown authority or reliability (for me) and appears to give a basic filmography and restates the Sheen incident. It doesn't list any awards or anything. The second source comes up as a list of newspapers with no mention of the subject of this article (links may have been dynamically generated and changed) - anyway, I'm just not pulling up a German newspaper article on her on this second link. If her notability can be defended, no problem, but those two sources aren't doing it for me (and I'm just a single editor waiting for other editors to weigh in). --Quartermaster (talk) 21:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- According to BILD, see above, she has been paid by Sheen with 12.000 Dollars for some hours. Is that normal in the US? I don't think so, or? What's the usual price for a prostitute in NYC/the US, let's say for 4 hours? 78.55.55.121 (talk) 00:21, 2 November 2010 (UTC) btw: In Germany the price starts with 20 bucks (quick, in a car) up to 1200 Dollars (young beauty, stylish bar, one night), but 1500 Dollars is the limit. 78.55.55.121 (talk) 00:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and radically improve. She's a well-known adult performer with over 30 films. The Sheen incident is news and worthy of mention in the wiki but not the hook for the whole thing. Needs a lot of work but there's a viable wiki in here. --78.101.170.162 (talk) 06:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can find no cite where it shows she's been in 30 films. In fact, I keep seeing all of these grandiose claims of her fame from anonymous IPs, with all of them (to date) unsupported.The current links in the existing article are borderline spam. --Quartermaster (talk) 19:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 14:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:BLP1E. Epbr123 (talk) 15:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because she is a well known adult porn star and many people are searching for more information all the time. Wikipedia is the only place where they can get the basic biography about her in a short time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.212.40.212 (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The "basic biography" says three things: she was born in 1988; she's a porn star; there was an incident with Charlie Sheen. In my book, that's not a biography, basic or otherwise. The "well known" contention is not being supported by external sources. Known? Yes. WELL known? Hardly.
- All of these generic and unsupported statements of notability from anonymous IPs are starting to become annoying. --Quartermaster (talk) 19:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have linked yesterday the German article above, so a native English speaker may put the informations into the article here.
- What's the common prize of a whore in the US? 78.55.11.225 (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- All of these generic and unsupported statements of notability from anonymous IPs are starting to become annoying. --Quartermaster (talk) 19:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.