Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Cook Hotel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Cook Hotel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP. there is coverage for the same named hotel in Sydney, Auckland, Alaska, and Bendigo, but nothing to warrant this one. LibStar (talk) 06:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete random hotel - not notable. Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete sources not found to support notability. mere PROMO.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:30, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is a small and partially abandoned hotel complex, with zero evidence of notability. Bearian (talk) 23:41, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.