- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Sledge Hammer!. just enough consensus - but also it is virtually the same thing then what is mentionned in the Sledge Hammer thus no real additionnal info in the now redirected article JForget 21:47, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Captain Trunk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:INUNIVERSE fansite article about a television character who has no sourced indication of notability outside the short-lived series he existed in. Was tagged for prod, but deprodded with no explanation or improvement provided. No need for a whole article about this. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 08:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Significant topic and plenty of potential for expansion. Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 23:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Significant how? Bearcat (talk) 04:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Significant in that Sledge Hammer! is one of the greatest television shows in history. Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You're certainly entitled to believe that on your own time. In an encyclopedia, however, we require reliable sources for such a claim. Bearcat (talk) 04:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Significant in that Sledge Hammer! is one of the greatest television shows in history. Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Significant how? Bearcat (talk) 04:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of significance. Even if the TV series is THE greatest in history it does nothing to WP:verify notability or significance of this character. Failure to WP:PROVEIT that this is a notable character due to a lack of third party sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Sledge Hammer!, which has almost exactly the same content. At this stage I think there may be a case for the title character's significance, but while Captain Trunk may have played an important role in the series, Trunk doesn't seem to have been significant enough to warrant a separate article. - Bilby (talk) 13:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.