Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Wasit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. WP:CSD#G3 Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 22:08, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Capture of Wasit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Capture of Wasit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ditto as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Siege of Samarkhel. Full of LLM generated rubbish [1] with no descriptive mentions of the event (see "The Capture" section). – Garuda ^Talk! 23:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Pakistan, Middle East, Saudi Arabia, and India. – Garuda ^Talk! 00:11, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. – Garuda ^Talk! 00:12, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• This is a hoax. It doesn't even agree with the quotations from its own sources. Historical records such as al-Tabari's history (translated by Bosworth, SUNY Press, 1991) record that Ujayf ibn Anbasa defeated the Zutts in 834, not that the Zutts captured things in 834. Uncle G (talk) 07:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete G3 and note that the articles Wasit and Zuṭṭ have been polluted with this rubbish. Mccapra (talk) 12:35, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I have tagged it for speedy deletion as hoax. Thanks for the notice. Rubik's Cube 3x3 (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.