- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Cara-C (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Zero reliable secondary sources. A glance at article's talkpage shows that untrue claims-to-fame have been removed in the past so I'm inclined to doubt every single "fact" on this article as none are backed up by WP:RS. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 16:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 16:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, with regret; only because I did a lot of cleanup on it, and I hate to see that go. But a cleaned-up article on an unnotable subject is still an article on a unnotable subject. TJRC (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:53, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:44, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:20, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.