Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardinal Path

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:16, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal Path

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cardinal Path (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. The few references to reliable sources discuss the acquisition of the company, which is specifically classified by WP:CORPDEPTH as "trivial coverage". Cited book is not an independent source, because it was written by company co-founders. Sources outside of the article are no better. — Newslinger talk 23:41, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is an article about a subsidiary of a company that does not have an article. The article seems to fail WP:N, WP:COMPANY and WP:GNG by itself although it gets a lot of mentions in articles about its parent (see the news link above). It has had some mentions in partnerships, but these are really just press releases. There are not stories about the company as a subject to date.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:11, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 23:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 23:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 23:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 23:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.