- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 19:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cardinal Truth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails to establish notability per wp:band D0762 (talk) 16:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 19:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't find any evidence of this band, and its album Back for More, actually existing. See this Google search for example. Delete as a WP:HOAX. There certainly is no evidence that the band meets WP:MUSIC notability standards. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 19:58, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- this band either doesn't exist at all or is extremely non-notable.Reyk YO! 20:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.