Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CareOnGo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CareOnGo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and non notable. All the refs are either press releases or mere notices of funding. DGG ( talk ) 03:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I noticed this earlier, there's loads of news but that's expected for these subjects and my searches have found nothing better, it's newly started and thus is not expected to have anything else particularly better. SwisterTwister talk 00:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did find a few articles that talk about the company (see this and this from The Economic Times), but I'm not seeing the "direct" and "detail[ed]" coverage that is required by WP:GNG. As the nomination indicates, most coverage in secondary sources consists of press releases or notifications that the company has raised capital. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 14:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable and appears to be purely promotional. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.