Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carleton Rodgers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 10:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carleton Rodgers

Carleton Rodgers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too soon case-so far none of his films are that notable. Wgolf (talk) 20:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 20:53, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment-By the way the creator keeps on adding the unreliable stuff. Wgolf (talk) 20:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• -Still don't see the notability-they are mostly just a bunch of small indie films (nothing wrong with that, but the fact that they have nothing going for them either), someday maybe, but not today! Wgolf (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: WP:TOOSOON and WP:NYA. article subject fails WP:GNG. Even, the claimed award is not notable Wikicology (talk) 22:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per WP:TOOSOON. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - he nor his works have yet received significant amount of coverage, it seems. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 01:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.