Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carson Daly Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge into Carson Daly. Prodego ^talk 15:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Production company for one TV show (guess which). Fails WP:CORP. Was Prod'ed, but tag removed without comment; merge tag added, but nothing done. Calton | Talk 01:59, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Carson Daly otherwise Delete Crazynas 02:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge: Mention (in at most a sentence or two) on Carson Daly the fact that he runs this production company. Clear rest and redirect. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 03:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Carson Daly and if not delete it. Thetruthbelow ^(talk) 04:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge I'll go along. jbolden1517^Talk 04:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as much as can be usefully accomodated in Carson Daly – Gurch 08:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge then redirect savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 08:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I highly doubt a production company by Carson Daly would fail WP:CORP. The article certainly doesn't seem to think so, so keep notable production companies. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 14:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Highly doubt"? Anything to actually back up those vague feelings? Is Carson Daly Productions (NOT Carson Daly) the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself? Is Carson Daly Productions listed on ranking indices, produced by well-known and independent publications, of important companies? Is Carson Daly Productions' share price used to calculate stock market indices? Is Carson Daly Productions so well-known that its trademark has suffered from genericization? ("Let's carson-daly-productions that puppy!") Are there some important criteria you're using that I'm missing? --Calton | Talk 14:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • It helps if you read my whole comment. The article shows it fine. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 14:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • It helps if you read my whole comment: what part of "Carson Daly Productions (NOT Carson Daly)" was unclear? What part of Carson Daly Productions (NOT Carson Daly) is fulfilled by WP:CORP? What part of "anything to actually back up those vague feelings" was unclear? Hint: vague handwaving or "because I said so, that's why"? Not on. What, pray tell, actually separates Carson Daly from Carson Daly Productions? --Calton | Talk 15:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • It's his separate production company which is developing television shows, among other things. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 20:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • If nothing separates them, as you seem to be implying, then the two articles could be profitably merged. That might have been a better initial approach, than a PROD/AFD nomination, and also looks to be a likely outcome of this debate. WP:Corp is also a guideline. There is no need to reiterate all its points when you have already provided a link with your initial nom. Please show some respect for other opinions. Comments like "vague handwaving" and "not on" and the repetition of "what part" might be perceived as unnecessarily hostile. -- JJay 15:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge per above. -- JJay 14:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge. --Terence Ong 15:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable junk info. Bwithh 16:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable junk info. → Wombdpsw - @ ← 07:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or Delete. - FRCP11 12:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect, seems pretty clear since there's almost no content in this article. Vizjim 13:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.