Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carver Commodore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Carver Commodore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a band lacking the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to establish notability. The sourcing in the article is to spotify, apple music store, and the band's youtube channel. The best I could find in terms of coverage is article from a local TV station about bands returning to in person concerts. Aside from this, all I could find were concert listings and appearance mentions at music festivals. Whpq (talk) 17:43, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I, the creator of the page, did not add any of the apple music, youtube, or spotify sources. I had this article as a source for the bio, this bio can also be found on a couple other websites. The discography and references inside the discography sections were added into the article by carvercommodorecomrade.

MaxCupstid 17:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bio on a site that provides artist management or publishing services to the group. That's not independent coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.