- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. —Whouk (talk) 08:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article created by the software's author. Stated in reasonably neutral terms, but without evidence of significance, user base, innovation etc. Creator is apparently indef-blocked for legal threats. Just zis Guy you know? 16:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Forget the fact that the article's creator has been blocked seven separate times and was indefinitely blocked today. The article itself is what's important, and the article asserts no notability. -- Kicking222 18:14, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 22:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it. Wikipedia is not paper. ForbiddenWord 18:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]- On second thought, Delete. After googling around, it doesn't seem too notable. ForbiddenWord 16:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it. I don't understand what the problem is with this entry. AFAIK it's one of the few graphical podcatchers for Linux. (Full disclosure - I've contributed code to CastPodder). -— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.220.61 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.