Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle nectar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per the request of the author. Hut 8.5 17:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Castle nectar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Castle nectar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are other articles about Operation Castle, but this one is still a draft at best. Fuddle (talk) 16:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Fuddle (talk) 16:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftity Nowhere near ready for mainspace. Mccapra (talk) 17:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• I argue Draftify as well. It looks like it could potentially bacome a pretty decent article, but until then, no. Ghinga7 (talk) 22:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made this article because castle nectar didn’t even have a Wikipedia article and the page isn’t that big because their isn’t that much information about the bomb but i can’t improve it because my edits keep getting deleted deanhansen2

• Redirect to Operation Castle, rather than delete, but no objection to draftifying. What we have a stub; we should encourage the creator, probably a new editor (he has very few edits), to add more to make this into a proper article. Most of the other nuclear bomb tests if this series have an article, so that there is no reason why this should not. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s delete it I made a better one anyway so just get rid of this junk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deanhansen2 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.