Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalyst IT Services
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 01:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Catalyst IT Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
enough indication of possible importance to pass speedy, but I do not consider that being listed in one city's 40 under 40 demonstrates anything more than "might be notable someday", and the other factors listed are not particularly significant. DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article does not demonstrate that the company has achieved notability per WP:CORP. —C.Fred (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 11. Snotbot t • c » 19:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:CORP, spectacularly non-notable. ukexpat (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unless Notability can be established, should be deleted per WP:CORP TheMesquito (talk) 23:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable, hardly even a claim to notability. Hairhorn (talk) 04:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above (and because I'm too lazy to !vote to save it). GregJackP Boomer! 02:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Certainly not notable and doesn't come close to passing GNG. – Richard BB 22:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.