Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Power

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 20:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Power

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Catherine Power (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable independent wrestler. Worked mainly on independent level. Sources are WP:ROUTINE results of events, no in-deep coverage about her. A search shows only more ROUTINE events. [1] HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:52, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Wrestling, and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 18:04, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete : The Slam Sports article is fine (Canoe was a news source at the time), the Cape Breton article below it is rather local. I'd count those as maybe 1.5 sources. I tried to find more, no sourcing that I can find. With at least one more RS, I'd probably give this a weak keep. Just not enough at this time for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 18:56, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes GNG. In addition to the two sources noted above by Oaktree, here is another from the Windsor Star ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep The second source above from the Windsor Star shows notability. Covered in three different media from across Canada. Oaktree b (talk) 22:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Per above. Svartner (talk) 00:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: With the Windsor Star and Slam sources, this subject has the required IRS to meet the GNG. Let'srun (talk) 18:17, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.