Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cats Dancing on Jupiter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:18, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cats Dancing on Jupiter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The status of this film, produced by the director's own company, is uncertain: it was listed among "20 direct-to-DVD movies coming in 2011" by Moviehole.net and "a screening" in November 2011 was reported, but since then, nothing: I have found no independent criticism, and it is not found on AllMovie or Rotten Tomatoes or in Amazon. This is far short of the notability standard of WP:Notability (films). JohnCD (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 00:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable per JohnCD. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:19, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There hasn't been enough coverage of this film in any independent or reliable sources, at least not enough to show that it passes notability guidelines in general for films, let alone the more strict guidelines for films that have not yet been released. I'd suggest redirecting it to the director's wiki entry, but that seems to have its own fair share of notability concerns.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; fails the GNG. bobrayner (talk) 12:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It appears the film never received significant attention as Google News found nothing relevant. While searching for results myself, I found an unreliable blog here that claims the film received attention by The Washington Post and provides a photo but I can't find any evidence of this at the washingtonpost.com website. Regardless, the film is not notable. SwisterTwister talk 20:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - advertisement for a non-notable flop, not even famous as a flop. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, found anything more than SwisterTwister and the nominator in my searches. Probably there is a chance it will be notable when(/if) it will be released on video, but surely not now. Cavarrone (talk) 08:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG. — ΛΧΣ21™ 22:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.