Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Causation and association
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:00, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Causation and association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Research paper comparing and contrasting causation and association, which both have their own articles already SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as essay; creator is welcome to contribute sourced information to the existing articles. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:20, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not only do we already have articles on Causality and Association, there's also one on Correlation does not imply causation, so all bases are well covered. If there is anything to add to these three (I suspect it's mainly an issue of differences of culture and language, statistician-speak may not be scientist-speak or medic-speak) then it can certainly go into one of the existing articles. In other words, it's a WP:CONTENTFORK. Chiswick Chap (talk) 23:21, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- By the way, it may be worth adding hatnotes and 'See also's to help stop this happening again. Quite so often. Chiswick Chap (talk) 23:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Essay. Content fork. SL93 (talk) 23:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.