Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cause for Concern
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:05, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Cause for Concern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about two topics. It's about a do-it-yourself cassette label style in the 1980s and also about a band of this name based in South Bend, Indiana. The first appears to fail WP:GNG, and the latter fails WP:BAND. Additionally, custom searches such as these [1], [2] have yielded zero results in Google News archives. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 14:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 14:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 14:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - for lack of context and focus. What is the article about, exactly? Is it supposed to be a dab? Bearian (talk) 17:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 15:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not sure what the point of this article was, but both things fail at least WP:GNG. §FreeRangeFrog 21:56, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.