- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Also SK#1 (nom withdrawn). (non-admin closure) czar · · 10:09, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Cave in Sumatra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability, although a claim of importance has been made. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like a fairly solid keep here with this new info. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. czar · · 03:26, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. czar · · 03:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination.Might become notable if a real find and archeological/police findings are exceptional. But, bones in a cave is hardly WP-worthy.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 12:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]Delete per nom. No indication of notability.Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 12:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep with Chiswick Chap's expansion of the article. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is a little better than that: the cave is the first example of rock art in Sumatra, and the source of the largest number of skeletons found on any site in Indonesia, so those are two claims to notability, and the article is now referenced. I would be thinking about a merge to Archaeology in Sumatra if such an article existed; meanwhile, this stub/start is not much worse than some other articles on Sumatran archaeology. If we decide not to keep it at the moment, I'd be willing to begin Archaeology in Sumatra in my user space to gather up what we have on this and other archaeological sites in Sumatra into something referenced and readable. Ping me if needed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for clarifying. This changes my take.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 16:47, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to the cave's name, since "Cave in Sumatra" is just slightly vague. Ansh666 20:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename definitely. Seems like an important discovery, but the title of the page is horrible[User:Gmkeros|Gmkeros]] (talk) 11:00, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.