- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Unionhawk Talk E-mail 05:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ceel-dheer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Academic paper - wikipedia is neither a webhost or a publisher of original thought. Ironholds (talk) 18:09, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and move to Ceeldheer. In this state it is a perfectly OK geo-stub. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:33, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per RHaworth. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. It is a real district and after a few seconds of searching, a couple of BBC articles describe it as such. [1][2]--Oakshade (talk) 08:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per RHaworth - it's also a subject of research. Autarch (talk) 17:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.