Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celina Milner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Celina Milner

Celina Milner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Milner is a defeated candidate for the state legislature. This in no way makes her notable. None of her other accomplishments are even near notability. Candidates will always get a splattering of press coverage, but nothing here rises to the level of notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nominator. Unsuccessful political candidate with no notability outside of running for Senate. Meatsgains^(talk) 03:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note she ran for the state senate, not the US senate. This is a position in the legislature of her state. People at this level are almost never notable. Candidates for US senate have a higher chance of passing the notability hurdle.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A review of the available sources shows that subject neither meets GNG/BASIC nor the additional criterion for politicians. Sam Sailor 15:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.