- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 04:46, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism. Denni ☯ 03:49, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If it exists, it doesn't appear notable yet. If kept, move to Wiktionary. Herostratus 04:03, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This should really be a speedy delete. Firebug 04:12, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. I'll second Firebug's vote, and actually vote for it as a speedy. :) Janet13 06:20, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable neologism (and even if notable, a dicdef); probably a hoax anyway, Google hits seem all to refer to somethign else Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 17:37, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and move to BJAODN. Funny! linas 19:40, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Dalbury(Talk) 00:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki and delete. This is a dictionary entry, and a bad one at that. Stifle 12:48, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.