Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cellular Authentication Token

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both.--Fuhghettaboutit 11:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cellular Authentication Token

Article is advertising for a product, not encyclopedic content. Article contains several false claims about the products security and when and who invented it. (See my comment about it at the articles talkpage.) Article has been deleted twice before, one "proposed deletion" and one "speedy delete". David Göthberg 18:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just discovered that they made an article about their company too. So I just put that up for deletion too. --David Göthberg 19:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both, of course. --Goochelaar 20:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete sounds about right. Salvatore22 22:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not that it matters, but the creator of the article just removed the "Article for deletion" tag. (See this diff.) --David Göthberg 12:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT Delete A category of one-time-password technology of public interest — TELCOSEC-Mark (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Moreover, as of now the only other edit by TELCOSEC-Mark is to revert to a deleted edit by STLMatt, the originator of this CAT article, in One-time password, suggesting sock puppetry. --Goochelaar 22:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as continued spamming. Montco 01:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as on-time-notability has now passed.--Gavin Collins 12:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.