Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Information Technology Policy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete & redirect to Princeton University. -- KTC (talk) 13:24, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Information Technology Policy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established, might as well be a part of the article on Princeton. Ysangkok (talk) 13:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - couldn't easily find out when it was founded, but the date in the article is clearly wrong. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, though.... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Princeton University - The center exists, but there seems to be little to justify independent notability or a standalone article separate and aprt from the parent. I'm not seeing the sources at the center's website or in a Google search that would meet the notability standard at this time, but there is the potential for future expansion and sourcing. Alansohn (talk) 17:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 04:52, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The WP:GNG requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." A google search reveals pages on the institute, but only by Princeton itself -- not sources independent of the subject. A google scholar search reveals multiple articles mentioning staff who work at the institute, but no actual coverage of the subject. It seems the topic is not notable. Piboy51 (talk) 15:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails WP:ORG. As a standalone article. LibStar (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficient references from reliable sources to support notability. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 02:04, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.