Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Instrumented Critical Infrastructure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 06:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Instrumented Critical Infrastructure

Interesting anecdote, but a "grassroots group" formed today does not seem notable yet, however noble its goals may be. High on a tree 18:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:N. Eliz81 18:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:Crystal. Bills require executive action to become statutory law, per U.S. Const. Art. II. Bearian 18:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above plus the obvoius fact that this is spam. If they ever become notable someone else will write about them. MartinDK 19:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Currently not notable, and WP:CRYSTAL per Bearian above. The single reference isn't good enough either. *Cremepuff 222* 21:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- organization has accomplished nothing aside from building a web page naming itself (cited). "Please give us a few weeks to get this up and running," that page says. Delete until it does so. Mc sputnik 17:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
'Save this somehow I don't know the mechanism to consider this but there is more here than a new Grass Roots group. The group is likely not notable by itself but the story of how money was appropriated for an apparently imaginary organization and how this is a poster child for problems with the appropriations process is very newsworthy. A google search for "Center for Instrumented Critical Infrastructure" now returns 16,000 hits -up by several thousands in a few days not because of the new Grass Roots group but because of how it ties in with the budget mess and the magnitude of the congresspersons directly involved. So hopefully Wikipedians wiser than I can find a way to save this story - the story is very notable even if the grass roots group is not. [[user:Paulfromatlanta:Paulfromatlanta] 9:25 22, July 2007.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.