Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Knowledge Societies
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Center for Knowledge Societies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Lack WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH. Also, there is an issue with WP:RS. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. However, if anyone can update the page and bring it to WP:HEY level, then they are most welcome. - Hatchens (talk) 04:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 04:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, a small group of consultants with a defunct website. There are a few passing media mentions but no significant coverage, fails WP:NCORP. SailingInABathTub (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.