Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Resource Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:13, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Resource Solutions

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Center for Resource Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources present in article link back to the websites of the establishments described. Otherwise I cannot find sources. Mentions in Google Books are citations or the similar, with no prose written on it.

Article previously redirected to green energy (now redirect itself) by user in 2009, with the renewable energy article not mentioning this. Was then created by user whose only edit is making this article. Roast (talk) 01:37, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and California. Roast (talk) 01:37, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I'm finding some coverage about the Green-e certification program, but very little about the organization itself. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:30, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: In the talk page of the article, Maximum Covfefe, claiming to work for the company, said its employees were "going to get the article up to speed", which I disapproved of per COI. Covfefe retracted what she said.
• Delete may be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but I'm not finding WP:ENDURING, WP:SIGCOV to WP:V the claims of this org. Nayyn (talk) 21:39, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:47, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.