- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. still limited participation, but calling this a ten-day PROD as there is no dissent. StarM 04:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Centis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unnotable surname. The article exists only has a "dictionary" definition. With no notable people using the surname, it cannot be used as a disambiguation. Tavix (talk) 23:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - now that I removed the spam, it appears to be unsourced original research, and I agree with other arguments given by the nominator.--Boffob (talk) 14:32, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NOR, WP:RS and WP:N. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 01:21, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.