Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CertificationPoint

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. I'll just deal with the article. Speedy delete as entirely promotional (G11) & no indication of importance (A7) Protected against re-creat for a good while, not indef because conceivably they might become notable . DGG ( talk ) 23:30, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CertificationPoint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This web-based company has no reliable sources and a search revealed none. There is no assertion of notability and none appears to be present. I am also troubled at the history of this article. A speedy deletion template was removed multiple times by the article's creator -- when those edits were reversed, a SPA was created, User:Blgiles23, whose sole purpose was seemingly to remove a reference to a competing website and to decline the speedy deletions for reasons that cite policy but entirely mistakenly, in my opinion. I believe there is a strong possibility that Wikipedia's processes are being used in bad faith for WP:SPAM and I would welcome advice from more experienced users/admins as to the utility of a sockpuppet investigation. Ubelowme _U ^Me 22:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.