Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ch'uan Shu (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 18:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV. Should be prodded, but it's been nominated (though nom was withdrawn) for VfD before, so I felt it best to follow the policy to the letter. Captainktainer * Talk 11:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep if referenced. Appears to be a legitimate, if obscure, branch of the martial arts. I'm sure it can be verified and appropriate cites provided; however, this needs to happen if the article is to stay. Tevildo 11:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment I'd withdraw in a heartbeat if it were referenced fully. I hate deleting articles; I try to rescue articles from AfD whenever I possibly can. However, I haven't found any reliable sources, and this article's been lying fallow for months. Captainktainer * Talk 11:53, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per the above, subject to revision. Don't want this one to go out "No Consensus" and fall below the radar. Tevildo 12:27, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I wish I could speak a Chinese language so I could help out here... anyway, at least one source ([1]) suggests that this is a generic name for all Chinese martial arts (it translates roughly as 'Fist arts' according to a few sources). Another source that may be relevant: [2]. Ziggurat 02:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.