- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This result is unanimously overturned by DRV in light of new evidence here. Xoloz 12:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
del promo of a search engine launced on Sept. 1 2006. A couple of newspaper hypes is not a valid source for a highly technical topic, nor proof of its notability. Quoting: "an experimental version of ChaCha was launched Monday, and it immediately crashed and was down most of Tuesday." A feat of dubiuous notability IMO. `'mikka (t) 23:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Has only been around for 5 days. Fails WP:WEB as well. --Nishkid64 23:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom. This is WP:VSCA. Danny Lilithborne 23:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There also exists a ChaCha (search engine) article. That should probably go up for Afd as well. --Vossanova o< 16:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.