Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChainGPT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 14:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ChainGPT

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

ChainGPT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCRYPTO. A WP:before search on gnews and DDG found only press releases and dubious crypto websites, with passing mentions scattered about. Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NCRYPTO, per nom. Coverage consists of press releases and articles/mentions solely in crypto-centric news organizations. Mooonswimmer 12:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - on the rationale clearly expressed by Mooonswimmer. Nick Moyes (talk) 12:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Still more crypto fluff. This is from Yahoo finance but from a non-RS [1], Crypto Potato -cryptopotato.com/introducing-chaingpt-pad-an-ai-focused-launchpad-released-by-chaingpt/, which despite the snazzy name isn't a RS. Delete for lack of sourcing, PROMO. Oaktree b (talk) 13:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  The Potato site is a blacklisted one, so don't try using it as a source. Oaktree b (talk) 13:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete. the entire article is just an advertisement, and there are no reliable sources? DrowssapSMM (say hello) 00:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, bit of refbombing going on here. Fermiboson (talk) 08:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:BOMBARDMENT of sources to support a dubious claim of notability. Partofthemachine (talk) 02:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Seems like WP:SPA-created promo to me. Suitskvarts (talk) 14:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.