Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chain Reaction 2008

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:42, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chain Reaction 2008

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Chain Reaction 2008 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems this ran one or two years...not sure if it meets the WP:GNG. Raymie (t • c) 07:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Raymie (t • c) 07:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Raymie (t • c) 07:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Brown-era initiative that, despite having some prominent speakers, received zero sustained media coverage in reliable, independent sources. Looking at the (non-independent RS, single-source) brochure from the Council on Social Action it's not hard to understand why as it is far from clear what it was actually supposed to be about other than "social change". FOARP (talk) 10:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per nom, zero secondary sources Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:12, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - there are no signs of lasting notability or even a high level of coverage at the time. Dunarc (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.