Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chain of Strength

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. Seeing as Chain Of Strength passed AFD, it's probably a good idea to go and merge them, but I'll leave that to the relevant talk pages. Stifle 14:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also the related articles up for deletion: Chain Of Strength (duplicate article), What Holds Us Apart (record), True Till Death (record).

Like the other Chain Of Strength article, this one asserts no notability and should be deleted. Aplomado - UTC 04:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. "Members went on to bands like who??" Grandmasterka 06:00, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. Royboycrashfan 06:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Terence Ong 13:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn Celcius 13:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. ProhibitOnions 16:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep and merge the two articles of the same name. This band is one of the most noted of the genre. A google search for the name plus "straight edge" or "hardcore" both turn up 10s of thousands of hits. THe nominator seems to be on a single minded quest to remove them for some reason.Tombride 23:14, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Would you be so kind as to provide information from reliable external sources that back up this assertation, and confirm that this group meets at least one (preferably more) of the criteria noted at the Wikipedia:Notability (music) inclusion guideline? If this cannot be done, delete this and the duplicate Chain Of Strength (deletion debate) as non-notable band/group. -- Saberwyn 21:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Very Weak Keep and merge all related articles into one (Chain of Strength with a small of appears to be correct name). They've released 2 records via Revelation Records I'll leave it up to someone who knows about the American music scene to determine if this is a pass per WP:MUSIC. -- Saberwyn 03:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• keep = as above. For great justice. 01:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn. --Khoikhoi 03:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In what way are they not notable? They've released 2 records on a notable record label (per wikipedia notability requirements) and return 10s of thousands of google hits.Tombride 19:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as non-notable late 80s California band, featured members of who? Bands that don't even themselves have pages. Radagast83 19:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep main article and merge album pages, per Saberwyn. Band also has an All Music Guide entry, though the AMG doesn't have a bio and only lists the compilation album—not the two singles which currently reside on seperate pages. It's scraping the bottom of the notability barrel for certain, but I think a single article is justified. - Rynne 19:37, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep I think we've seen enough evidence of noability. Merge everything into CoS. - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 20:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.