Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaiseri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:56, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chaiseri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company does not seem to have sufficient third-party coverage sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep company seems notable enough as a producer of military vehicles it is just a crap stub article that just needs more work and better references. I have added one from Janes. MilborneOne (talk) 20:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are enough army enthusiasts to make military-related pages very difficult to delete, but the only source provided from "Africa Aerospace & Defense 2014 "is a blurb that reads like a press release. I will take the unpopular position of promoting consistent standards. CorporateM (Talk) 01:55, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per CorporateM Pokerkiller (talk) 21:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.