- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Chalkmaster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The lack of any non-local coverage and a relatively scant amount of local coverage given the links provided in the article leads me to the same conclusion as that of the nominator. Erechtheus (talk) 01:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. Artene50 (talk) 02:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for not notable. Tabor (talk) 02:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 06:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. As a Torontonian myself, his "legend" nevertheless seems to have escaped me. There are plenty of sidewalk chalk artists up here. He seems no more notable then the rest. freshacconcispeaktome 14:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable per nom ukexpat (talk) 15:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:N. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.