- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is no assertion or evidence of notability and there are no references. The article has already been deleted twice, by {{prod}} and {{db-nocontext}}, and I think it makes sense to establish whether it should stay deleted. —xyzzyn 22:44, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even putting the obvious WP:COI issues aside, it does not meet WP:SOFTWARE. CiaranG 23:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a typical conflict of interest article, which appears to be orignal research written by someone affiliated with the company. The article is simply a list of functions, features, versions and knowledge about a future release. Effort is put into placing multiple links to the company at the expense of establishing notability and providing the secondary references necessary to meet the WP:SOFTWARE criteria. ✤ JonHarder talk 03:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.